Coming Events

         The following information was given to a newspaper office in advance of the events occurring. The proof is yet to occur. In the next few years you may have to confirm that you saw it said here, in advance of the occurrences.

December 29, 1992
         People who sense things either past or future are often unknown. Amongst those who have witnessed such disclosures there is belief that this is possible but beyond them are a great number of people who are unconvinced. Unbelievers tend to rationalise unfamiliar information into a process where it is dismissed without proper consideration. This notification of events to occur should diminish some disbelief yet not everyone will be convinced there is anything more than their five senses.
         The proof of an ability to foresee will be that the events listed here will be sufficiently uncharacteristic so not to be classified as "lucky" guesses. The possibility that any one of the events is going to occur in the time frame given is always there. That they all occur in the time period indicated will confirm it is not by luck. For the gambling man the odds of it occurring as stated (or within reason, not necessarily the time) are far greater than the odds against winning a lottery. If there was a typical event or commonness to foresight of major occurrences then it would be commonplace for everyone to do it. Such is not the case. A crucial deficiency is in pinpointing the time.
         Several significant events known to me will (start to) occur after 1996. The exact timing of them and relative positioning to each other is not known but given that let me begin with four groups of events occurring. In random order there will be two events where human action could have averted the situation. The other two are natural events, one seems to be expected by many but no one knows the magnitude, how many or when.
         1. There will be an airline crash in Vancouver. (The first commercial aircraft to do so). It's a charter flight (beginning with a C? like Chapman?) coming from the south. The crash may involve a bridge or mountain as it banks/circles it hits the water. It appears to be either a recurring pilot error, or after several attempts are made, possibly someone unfamiliar with the area. The plane will be recovered. The forward part of the seating will be relatively intact, the back section was not shown. The time seemed near the middle of October. (year not given).

 
2. Another mishap may involve an American space shuttle after it has started down for a landing but still very high up (over a dry desert lake?in Eastern California? Death Valley?). It will be intercepted by another fast flying object coming in from another angle from higher behind. The result will be its burning high up in the atmosphere. It comes down but whether intact or not enough to maintain the crew was not indicated. It didn't appear possible. One man hanging on (directing it) left (died?) just after it was hit. (At best I could only make an informed guess if asked to give more info about this. The crews would be the ones who would be best to discover when it could happen. Most everyone can learn to foresee so they are not where disaster will occur.)
         3. The first of the four events to occur is actually three events. Year not given, in the early morning hours before many people have gone to work a very large earthquake will affect our area and the southern part of Vancouver Island. This will be the third big and the largest of three shakes to hit our area. The two earlier earthquakes will almost be as big and will be fairly close together. The first big one will be about June 26 (year not given) about the time school is getting out (for the year?). Deaths will be associated with at least one of the earthquakes. (The third one may be as early as late August or as much as six months after the first one). On the Richter scale the first two could be in the area of 6 to 6.6 and the third one up to 7.5. My expectations on this are that it could occur within months of the sighting and reporting of the comet-asteroid combo.

 
The 'quakes are large enough to create tsunamis in the Strait of Georgia which may affect anyone with waterfront property in the Lower Mainland or Islands as the waves bound from shore to shore. Tsunamis can scour a shoreline for long distances or create high walls of water demolishing any buildings in its path. There is often very little advance notice of them as they can travel at speeds of more than 700 km/h and yet those shock waves can travel across an ocean to hit on the opposite side. The water borne shock waves can bunch together in shallower waters and rise to exceptionally high levels, largely depending on the magnitude of the disturbance which caused it. Low lying areas and bays are hit worst. Some long term effects will occur affecting anyone taking the Tsawwassen ferries to Victoria. It appears there will be a thrust raising the land blocking Active Pass from use by any big ship initially and then everything. There will also be a thrust raising the land on the Surrey side of the Fraser. The fault continues up the Pitt Valley. (In the picture on the left if this was an actual tsunami the person and photographer would have no time to get out of the way as they travel up to 50% faster than the speed of sound.)
For quake info and tsumani info.

          A number of Vancouver's downtown and West End buildings will be deemed to be unsafe and many will not be repaired but be demolished and lots left vacant whether from one or all of the 'quakes. It will substantially change the face of this area with the number of buildings being lost by parts of them falling.
         The Marine building will be given an okay but much to everyone's surprise will be torn down not much later (after rebuilding efforts are underway on the others being rebuilt). At least two downtown hotels will also be torn down, a third one was already scheduled for demolition. It seemed 10-15% of the larger buildings were damaged and some older ones fell apart. (We can do rather little about earthquakes except not to be there when it happens if we chose to live where earthquakes can occur. We seldom address one of the significant causes of increases of earthquakes, underground nuclear testing. So little is known by so many people that in some places nuclear power generation is seen as a favorable industry to have close by!)
        Compare: Rev 11:13 And in that hour there was a great earthquake, and a tenth of the city fell; seven thousand people were killed in the earthquake, and the rest were terrified and gave glory to the God of Heaven. with the aforementioned event. If this is an analogy relating both to the "city" many consider is Jerusalem and it turns out to be a reference to my city then the plot thickens... The event doesn't occur until after the sighting of the comet, but 'in that hour' would indicate a strong likelihood that it would be within a year. That it is my city and not Jerusalem literally will ensure that the literalists are confounded by the Creator. Would it be possible to warn people of this in advance... sure, but who would be listening, or responding? It would I think be a rather small audience beforehand... but certainly would increase afterwards. Not exactly an ideal way to get recognition but an earthquake is not within my control, although warnings of it could be.

         4. The most significant events are so unusual the likelihood of pointing to an area of less than 1000 sq kilometres out of a world surface area of half a million times more than that makes the odds of identifying such a thing very slim. Statistically very few mountains blow up and those which do are known volcanos. In that there are going to be at least three eruptions "locally" in a short time period in separate locations is highly improbable. Given the possibility of an eruption occurring as one in 10,000 years (in our province) to be able to say three of them will occur the odds are one in a billion or greater).
         One volcano erupts close to Chilliwack, perhaps straddling the border. (It will eventually grow to be nearly as high as Mount Baker to the south of it. At the onset of eruptions it will require substantial evacuations rapidly to ensure the people living in the area will not be killed. There will not be much time from the first indication of it to the time it blows up. The first signs of it and only warning will be steam or fog rising from the waters of nearby rivers (this, presumably caused by deep earthquakes). It will begin from a crack on the lower side of a mountain and blow up very shortly after. There will be almost no time to effect an evacuation.

         Another one could take with it a small wild-fire suppression crew, air dropped to put out a fire reported by its initial, not yet explosive, release. Not many explode like Mt St Helens without some advance warning. It may only be minutes more before it explodes. Imagine a smaller appearance or beginning to the volcano you see here.
         The time of year appears to be at one end of the fire season (it seemed it could be early). The blast effects of the second one will substantially disrupt the Fraser and Thompson Canyon Highways. Some of the existing tunnels will be affected. The highway will be rebuilt, though roughly. A new lake appeared by the highway was created by some blockage. The water level will drop suddenly yet not completely.

 Visit here to see more about volcanos or here.

          You know the worst, yet even when we know the worst it isn't a neccesity for it to occur, unless we in our foolishness are unwilling to plan for the eventuality of such a disaster. It takes more than last minute planning. I'm not an alarmist, and I'm not crying "wolf". This requires planning on a massive scale.