Logo4.GIF (19516 bytes)  

ButtonOver.JPG (1578 bytes)

ButtonFindings.JPG (1754 bytes)

ButtonContext.JPG (1535 bytes)

ButtonMapping.JPG (1801 bytes)

ButtonArtifacts.JPG (1925 bytes)

ButtonImages.JPG (1572 bytes)

P131.JPG (29780 bytes)

Progress Report: November 6, 1999

Team Members:

William B. Barr, MA (Project Director)

Cecile Hollyfield, BFA (Director of the Celtic Legacy Foundation)

Scott G. Sutton, MA (Archaeological Consultant)

Ben B. Hollyfield (Field Technician)

Amanda K. Saum, BA (Field Technician)

Written by Scott G. Sutton

Bar.JPG (2120 bytes)

November 6, 1999

With three hours of sleep, the crew headed to the field under sunny skies.  Upon arrival, Barr and Sutton began survey work, taking shots of the masonry tower, the "Christian chapel", and the stone wall running between the two.   Of particular interest, readings revealed similar elevations for the Roman portion of the structure.  Shots of the eastern wall foundation and the eastern segment of the southern wall yielded elevations within 1/5 of an inch.  Also, the eastern corner foundations of the "Christian chapel" produced readings within 2/100ths of an inch.

While Cecile Hollyfield took further photographs of the site, Saum and Ben Hollyfield continued mapping the floor plan of the masonry tower.  In the afternoon, the team cleared the Roman walls of plant growth which threatened the tower's integrity.  From the hearth, Sutton chopped down two small trees that had toppled the lintel, and the roots of which were displacing the hearth's lower masonry.  Once done, Barr, Saum, and Ben Hollyfield attacked an aggressive deciduous vine which had overgrown the top of the wall.  Their efforts cleared the northernmost window and much of the remaining wall. 

Before leaving the site, the team members reviewed their observations regarding the structural evolution of the tower.  The interior partition wall jutting from the northern wall post-dates the Roman occupation.  Not only does the stone work qualitatively differ from the Roman portion, but it overlies linear floor stones that once demarcated the same areas.  These stones parallel but do not align with the existing partition. 

As to the Roman Period portion of the tower, the team noted a cement basing around the walls, likely added in the 20th century to reinforce the walls' integrity.   For analysis, Barr took mortar samples from each of the distinguishable masonry styles.  The Roman Period stonework of the tower was constructed with a fine red clay mortar, while the medieval masonry utilized reddish-brown clay mortar with sand, shell, and fiber tempering.  Mortar from the 18th/19th century addition appear comprised of a limestone base with fine twigs, straw, and small pebbles used for tempering.

In the afternoon, Cecile Hollyfield located a panoramic map that shows an old Roman Road that appears to correspond with the one on site.  To the west, on the other side of the ridge, it extends in the direction of a Roman  Period trade center and interior port.  This is the direction in which the road leads uphill from the well.  To the east, the road leads toward a circular medieval castle tower approximately four miles to the east.  According to the property owner, local lore has it that the masonry tower on site was used to monitor and communicate with the castle tower.

The crew continues to speculate on the original purpose of the masonry tower. Obviously, the spring provides a convenient supply of water needed to sustain a garrison.  However, nestled against the hillside, the tower provides a poor defensive position for repelling assaults from above.  Situated at the convergence of three valleys, the tower is strategically positioned.  Although the tower does provide a vantage point from which to monitor traffic in two of the valleys, these views are not as comprehensive as might be provided by positioning further uphill.  Perhaps the Romans built the garrison to monitor activites at the well, a sacred Celtic site.  Or maybe they built here for reasons unseen by the modern eye.  The overhang of a possible rockshelter protrudes from the hillside directly behind the garrison.  Before erosion buried the rockshelter, perhaps it accessed underground deposits of salt or tin.  The value of southeastern Wales as a source of these resources is well documented, and a vast cave system has been recorded in a neighboring county.  It just may be that Llgadwy's Roman occupants mined the earth below. 

Bar.JPG (2120 bytes)

Note:  These investigations are ongoing, and updates will be posted as time permits.  Assessments made during the course of this survey are preliminary, and may change upon the recovery of further data.

 


Web site created by Scott G. Sutton

William B. Barr & Associates
P.O. Box 4007, 204 E. Church Street
Leesville, South Carolina 29070
Telephone: (803) 532-0392
E-mail: bbbarch1@aol.com

LogoMini.GIF (8945 bytes)