Although many
YMCAs have been in dialogue for more than a year with their members regarding
this program change, they still often are confronted with questions and comments
similar to these. If you need help in answering members’ questions, try these
responses.
Member: The only reason you’re doing this is to be politically
correct.
YMCA: Being politically correct was never a motive for this
change. We always have believed that this is the right thing to do for the right
reasons. We must align our program practices with our initiatives for character
development and diversity. We can no longer in good conscience support an
Indian-themed program.
Member: We’ve already given up so much. How much more is expected?
YMCA: Yes, the 2001 transition from YMCA Indian Guides to
YMCA Guides meant we had to let go of some of our program practices. I know this
was difficult, but we appreciate your support and willingness to do so. When the
review team met in 2002, they really tried to preserve as much of the original
program as possible. The team concluded that to retain any Indian terms or
practices could be misconstrued and some of what has been deemed inappropriate
might continue. Anything short of a new direction would not have addressed the
real issues. We have retired some of program’s most controversial elements, but
we were able to hold on to so much more: the aims, purpose, structure, slogan,
pledge, etc.
Member: Why are we giving up something that isn’t broken?
YMCA: Some Ys have adapted the program over the years and
have had the support of Native Americans. This has made the need for change
difficult to see. Although many feel the program wasn’t “broken,” it appeared to
be severely flawed to people who found it offensive. For many Ys, Indian Guides
was no longer a relevant program, and they had stopped offering it years ago. As
you may know, the number of Ys offering the program has declined over the past
decade.
Member: Who has complained? How many complaints have there been?
Where is the pressure coming from?
YMCA: The decision wasn’t based on the volume of complaints
we received. We had heard that many Native Americans were reluctant to share or
had stopped sharing their concerns because we didn’t appear to listen—we
continued to offer the program. For others, filing a complaint with the YMCA
just wasn’t characteristic of their individual or cultural makeup. We made the
change to keep our programs consistent with our Diversity Initiative and
character development values and to create a new direction in programming that
has a broader appeal to families of all cultures and configurations.
Member: Who drove the change? Why is it being done? Who is going to
make us change?
YMCA: The change process began, as it often does, with
conversations at the local Y level. Staff members expressed concerns, and many
Ys stopped offering the program. YMCA of the USA staff and volunteers have
debated this issue for the past two decades. The adoption of the National
Diversity Initiative heightened the need to move quickly to a resolution. Local
YMCAs have complete autonomy and will make the decision to end, change, or
continue this program. YMCA of the USA has no authority in this decision. The
role of Y-USA is to provide leadership and materials. Local YMCAs will need to
assess their own abilities to continue a program without national materials and
consider the concerns voiced in their own communities, the potential for
controversy, and any repercussions they might face by not following the change.
Member: We’ve done this backward: You should have introduced a new
program at the onset of any talk of change.
YMCA: This has been one of the most difficult factors in
this change process, and we’ve received some criticism for our decision to have
a dialogue about change before we introduced a new program. We saw the dialogue
as a way to prepare for the change process. Knowing what we know about how
people adapt to change, we felt we would have fallen flat had we simply released
a new program. The dialogue created an impetus for change. It also allowed us to
talk to and involve hundreds of people in the process. We were also faced with a
pretty small window of opportunity. The National Diversity Initiative was in
effect. For us to be credible, we needed to acknowledge the problems we saw in
the Indian Guides program. Experience has taught us it takes about 18 months to
develop a program and provide published materials. It was too long to wait.
Member: Doesn’t the Indian Guides program do more good than harm?
YMCA: I guess that depends on who answers the question. Of
course, the program did so much good in building relationships between a parent
and a child. Some will argue, however, that we did harm in teaching and
perpetuating Native-American stereotypes. We’ve tried very hard to preserve all
that was good in the program so that we can continue to strengthen relationships
between parents and children. It also is helpful to keep in mind that YMCAs
offer programs as a tool to achieve the YMCA’s mission. YMCA parent-child
programs are tools to build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. Some
questioned if the messages being conveyed about Native Americans were really
healthy and accurate.
Member: But we’re being respectful. Why can’t we continue? We’re
educating our children about Native Americans.
YMCA: Yes, some YMCAs worked closely with Native Americans,
museums, and other resources and were able to teach their children about
Native-American history and culture. However, in many cases, what we taught was
not well-researched, accurate, sensitive, or authentic. Native Americans told us
that that kind of information and teaching does more harm than good, not only to
our children but also to theirs.
Member: We really have been respectful and have researched the
Native-American themes.
YMCA: Then we hope you’ll be able to carry some of this into
YMCA Adventure Guides. Inviting Native Americans into your program, visiting
museums, reading stories about Native Americans, and doing research are all
appropriate activities. What is no longer appropriate is adopting another
culture to deliver a program.
Member: There isn’t enough magic in the new program. It doesn’t
feel right. I can’t get people excited. Where’s the magic? Where’s the
spirituality?
YMCA: Most participants agree that it took YMCA Indian
Guides decades to evolve into the magical program we know today. Like all YMCA
programs, the magic wasn’t created in the manuals, program promotional
materials, or direction provided by YMCA of the USA. Instead it was created in
local YMCAs, inspired by the creativity and dedication of participants who
shared their best ideas with others. We’re confident the same will happen with
YMCA Adventure Guides.