*** FAA Orders Inspections of Wiring on the 174 MD-11 Fleet |
As
part of the FAA's ongoing efforts to address the MD-11 wiring concerns raised by the
Swissair accident, the agency ordered inspections of wiring and insulation in the cockpit
and cabin on all U.S. operated MD-11s. The FAA continues to work closely with the Canadian
Transportation Safety Board (CTSB) and NTSB on potential MD-11 safety issues. The CTSB suggested a closer look at the wiring in the MD-11 fleet. Several MD-11s were examined as part of the Swissair accident investigation. Based on the wiring discrepancies found, the directive requires U.S. operators to perform the inspections, and make any necessary repairs, within 60 days and report findings to the FAA. Worldwide, 174 MD-11s are affected by this AD, 65 of which are U.S.- registered. Foreign carriers include Swissair, Varig, JAL, KLM and EVA. U.S. carriers are American, Delta, FedEx, and GATX. The cost to U.S. carriers is estimated at $720 per aircraft, $46,800 total for the U.S. fleet. |
http://www.faa.gov/apa/pr/pr.cfm?id=676
|
Wednesday, February 3, 1999 FAA orders tackle repeat problems By STEPHEN THORNE -- The Canadian Press OTTAWA (CP) -- Airworthiness directives issued by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration are falling short of their marks, says an agency member who sees the same problems being repeated across the industry. A directive last Thursday called for a one-time inspection for chafed or otherwise damaged wires in MD-11 planes like Swissair's Flight 111 that crashed off Nova Scotia on Sept. 2, killing 229 people. But a one-time inspection is not enough, says Ed Block, recently appointed to an FAA task force on electrical wiring. "Why isn't there a stated repeat in 60 days and every 60 days thereafter? If there's a chafing problem, when is it going to show up? This one-time inspection's going to do it? "If the issue is repeated rubbing or chafing or shorting, it should be a periodic inspection," he said in an interview from Pennsylvania. "These airworthiness directives are like handwriting on the wall, or tremors before an earthquake." He also noted that the wiring directives did not specify what insulation was suspect. None identified the type of insulation involved -- Kapton -- and therefore they didn't alert operators of other aircraft types using the same electrics. "If they put out an airworthiness directive on a Pratt and Whitney engine, they'd look at all the Pratt and Whitney engines," said Block. "If they have a frailty or shortcoming in a wire type, then why wouldn't they look at all the different models that use that type wire?" Block said similarities between 1991, '92 and '99 directives are striking. In 1992, a directive was issued to inspect wiring between the cockpits and cabins of 747 Model 300, 400, and 500 aircraft -- the same area of concern as currently on MD-11s. It required operators to repeat the inspection "at intervals not to exceed 120 days." In 1991, the FAA ordered Boeing's 400 series of 747s inspected for chafing and wear similar to that found in the MD-11s. The directive, under study by crash investigators, cited the wire bundle installation in the 747s' advanced cabin entertainment and service systems. "The amendment is prompted by reports of chafed wiring resulting in short circuits which led to burned wire bundles," the FAA said. "This condition, if not corrected, could result in smoke and fire in the passenger cabin." The directive last Thursday came after Canadian and U.S. investigators found evidence of wire insulation damage in more than a dozen of the McDonnell-Douglas planes, including some belonging to Swissair. "This action requires a one-time inspection to detect discrepancies of certain wiring and insulation in the cockpit and cabin, and repair, if necessary," said the directive. "The actions specified in this (directive) are intended to prevent electrical arcing of certain wiring, which could cause fire and-or smoke in the cockpit or cabin." Flight 111's pilot reported cockpit smoke before the MD-11 plummeted into the ocean. Investigators have focused much of their attention on the plane's electrical and entertainment systems. Canadian authorities have found signs of electrical arcing in wires from the downed jet that could be the result of damage such as cracks or chafing. Kapton is hard, sometimes brittle, and can wear away softer insulations with flight vibration. It can also be easily damaged with handling and has been known to break down with age. Swissair's high-tech entertainment system used soft Tefzel-insulated wires. It was installed by a California-based company early last year. The entertainment systems aboard the 65 jumbo jets affected by the 1991 order were installed by Boeing when the aircraft were built. The problems should not be related, said a Boeing spokesman. "It's installation, not insulation," Russ Young said from Seattle. Indeed, a Boeing service bulletin dated Aug. 29, 1991, advised operators to inspect the 747s for correct installation as well as damaged insulation. |
|