Pattern theology is here defined as the enforcing of examples as if they were patterns of law for all Christians in all ages. For example, we see in Acts 20:8 that the Christians met in an "upper room". From this pattern the "upper room" schism (sect) evolved. We see in Matthew 26:27 where Jesus said, "this cup". Hence the "one cup" sect. From the same passage the term "cup", (not glass) is used, and since glasses don't have handles, and cups do, the "cups with handles" sect emerged. And similarly the "kneeling while praying", the "no make-up, no jewelry, and the "break bread then bless it" ideas evolved. And as if Satan were not satisfied with so few schisms, he introduced the silence induced schisms. From the silence pattern we see a host of schisms. We see the "no bus, no kitchen, no orphanages" sect. And from this pattern we also see the "no Bible class" and the "no musical instrument" sects. Sadly, it appears that the silence induced patterns are applied only in connection with particular party positions. Glaring inconsistencies are glibly explained away. For example, the silence advocates justify the use of water fountains, ornate cathedrals, plush preacher offices, four part harmony, elevated pulpits, overhead projectors, air-conditioners, and a host of other aids which are without scriptural pattern.

There are patterns that should be observed. Pattern theology is especially bad when it emphasizes pet patterns to the neglect of greater principles. The love pattern is the most often neglected. Pattern theologists neglect the love pattern when they become exclusive. They neglect the love pattern when they draw "silence" or "inference" induced conclusions and enforce them as tests of fellowship. This is teaching for doctrine the commandments of men and is condemned by God. It is a dangerous position to insist on compliance with one's conclusions. This is the divisiveness condemned in Romans l6:l7. This is the exclusiveness condemned in1'st Corinthians chapter I.

There are positive patterns to be observed. They are called, "fruits of the Spirit". Very seldom do brethren divide over them. It is an interesting fact that most of the divisive issues can be traced to what men have concluded to be inferred by God. The fruits of the Spirit, in contrast, are very clearly perceived. When brethren put on the mind of Christ they are busy producing these fruits. They are not busy stirring up division among brethren. They are busy trying to carry one another's burdens. Galatians 6:2. They are busy trying to accept one another. Romans l5:7.They are busy trying to forbear one another. Ephesians 4:2. They are busy trying to build up one another. 1'st Thessalonians 5:ll. In short, they are trying to love one another. These are primary patterns-the basics of Christianity. If we miss the point on these patterns, it does not matter about the others. We have become as tinkling brass.

Perhaps a new definition of "pattern theology" would be in order. It should embrace the idea that Jesus is "the" pattern. Our pattern is a person, and that person is the Christ of God. While some meticulously search the Scriptures for patterns, in order to lay heavy burdens on us, shouldn't we be searching for the riches of Christ in His person? Shouldn't we be trying to put on the mind of Christ? He is our unfailing pattern. It is to Him that we should look for our pattern of conduct in every matter. He, and He alone, is the all sufficient answer. Let us pattern ourselves after Him.

Please think on these things. I believe them to be true to the Word.

Write The Author

Back To Living Stones

This page hosted by Get your own Free Home Page