Yes, that could sounds like a bakery advertisement spot - a luscious and rich complex
of VALUES comprehensible by a human. The advertisement professionals know how to make a
perfect, deep and long lasting human experience. These are the only basic bricks of human
associations - as the cognitive process develops human's knowledge, the "memory"
connects these identifications together into complexes of associations compound from
previous associations and again with BIS basic values. This is also the way how a man is
able to build up more and more complex objects in its mind - such as people's
identification and their relations, abstract thinking, ways how to get a love, as well as
the reason to kill somebody. My opinion is, that also whole the "abstract"
mathematics is also build up from a very concrete PDA output values and instinct output
values, providing us the basic information about the outer world, such as "what is
much and what is few", "rising", "falling", "add in vs.
ablate". Did you know, that all the complex instructions in your computer are based
only on a simple "plus" and "minus" functions in binary system of ones
and nulls? Anyway, I do not claim, that a human thinking is a binary system - its
architecture could be identified as Extensible Instruction Set Computing - let's
call it "EXISC".
The human brain EXISC system must be very simple, but effective. It's a single purpose
processor where is no flexibility in its utilization. Your brain will never work with
another "hardware components"- this firmware was developed by the evolution as
an integrated system of input and output components creating a human body. The EXISC is
expanding its architecture from an initial state I named "Baby program" directly
by creating its new instructions based on special associations of basic BIS values
(Primary Data Analysis and Instincts identifications) and secondary BIS values
(association of the previous). This instruction set expansion is, what we actually call
"retention" or "memorization"- associating new circumstances with the
previous knowledge of a human entity. This process is directed and influenced by an
Instinct analysis output. Let's say you should remember these five pieces of information:
1. "axcmasg h64sfg4 5fgcvfyfsd g546e"
2. "equalizer orange snail potato luck"
3. "Cry"
4. "Today it was a nice day."
5. "Your neighbor won 1 million dollars."
You remember only meaningful words - as closer to simpler and stronger emotion they
are, they are simpler to gain retention.
Let's stop for a while here- it's about time to mention about one of the most
progressive AI project in global human knowledge definition and analysis - "CYC Ontology Guide".
"The knowledge base is built upon a core of over 1,000,000 hand-entered assertions
(or "rules") designed to capture a large portion of what we normally consider
consensus knowledge about the world."
CYC ontology guide defines and analyzes global human knowledge in a logical tree
structure with 3.000 expression on the top or basic level which should be able to describe
and compose any other in the levels below. THE top level is their "basic instruction
set", from which any human expression should be originated. THE top level is the key
difference between our theories. The CYC top level selection is based upon linguistic
terminology analysis and grouping providing forced segmentation of the human thinking into
43 categories. Do you think, that your brain or thinking or inner world could be based on
these categories:
"Fundamentals
Top Level
Time and Dates
Types of Predicates
Spatial Relations
Quantities
Mathematics
Contexts
Groups
"Doing"
Transformations
Changes Of State
Transfer Of Possession
Movement
Parts of Objects
Composition of Substances
Agents
Organizations
Actors
Roles
Professions
Emotion
Prepositional Attitudes
Social
Biology
Chemistry
Physiology
General Medicine
Materials
Waves
Devices
Construction
Financial
Food
Clothing
Weather
Geography
Transportation
Information
Perception
Agreements
Linguistic Terms
Documentation"
Actually, I appreciate the giant analytical work of CYC, but they have a vast amount of
still too complex expressions in the basis. In my scheme, these expressions could be
comprehensively analyzed much deeper in a natural line of association of BIS instruction -
up to the instincts components and their relation to circumstances or receptors PDA
values.
Let's take a word from Biology category of CYC ontology - "Mammal":
By CYC explanation, "mammal" is the basic level expression which should be
one of basic expressions compounding any animal description. This could work only when a
human life was concerning only biology study. However - the human needs and possessions
have much more simpler basics based on natural living and original environment.
My analysis of the "mammal" word looks like this:
Mammal > Animal40+Sucks30+From20+Mother20+Milk15+Peace15+Love15+Youngling25
Animal > Group of [animal contours]20+[animal shapes]20+[animal
movements]5+[animal surfaces]40+[animal behaviors]5
Sucks > [Physical, sensual action of my own body]5+[Liquid]5+[Sucking sound]40
From > [Physical definition of a movement direction]40
Mother > [Mother]40
Milk > [Liquid]15+[White]40+[Food]+[Milk taste]10+[smooth surface]30
Peace > the world15+people30+[love]15
Love > women30+[peace]40
Puppy > [young animal]40+doggy20
Every individual reader could add his own extending expressions based on his individual
feelings - but there will still oscillate some universal consensual representation
of "mammal". The expression in [ ] parenthesis are definitively lowest and basic
BIS values. The rest, representing complex expressions, could lead the
analysis through a whole space of association of my life until it stops definitively on
BDR values I was equipped in first days of my life. The number values express subjective
strength of given association.
However, defining the BIS values already from first two levels of association could
provide 90% compatible definition for every human complex experiences based on the same
language, thus providing possibility to trace concrete and meaningful ideas in the brain
if you'll be able to lock their BIS connections between PDA centers.
A human is able to describe the
whole universe by words representing his experiences, knowledge and feelings. Everything
we think about is a process of confrontation between reality on the input side and our
human drives, instincts and demands on the inner side. Anything we do, anything we did,
was influenced either directly by our original inborn programs or by their
"complexes" created by interaction with reality and life as it is. But at the
very beginning of the life-journey of the human entity, there was only a simple program,
primary determining what was "good" and what was "bad" and responding
only by instinctive reactions. This "Baby Program" contains every embryo in its
DNA structure. The whole genetic information in a human is about 600MB (capacity of 1 CD
ROM). A chimpanzee has only 10% less of that. Only these 60MB of instructions (comparable
to some minimum installation of MS Windows) differed Albert Einstein from some Cheetah
from a jungle - when they were born. 