![]() | Statistical Methods used in Quality Improvement |
![]() | SPC and Capability Analysis |
![]() | Acceptance Sampling |
Definition of Quality
Traditional's View : Fitness for use
Modern' s View: Proportional to variability
Variation | |
Natural Variation | Unnatural Variation |
Chance Causes | Assignable Causes |
Common Causes | Special Causes |
Chronic Problems | Sporadic Problems |
Description | |
|
|
|
|
Example: Man |
Example: Man |
Interpretation | |
|
|
With only natural variation, the process is in control and predictable |
With unnatural variation present, the process is not stable and unpredictable |
An observation within the control limits means that the process is in control and shall not be adjusted |
An observation beyond the control limits means that the process shall be investigated and corrected |
Further or Necessary Action | |
Reduction of NV requires Management intervention at the system level by making changes to the system |
Elimination of UV requires Operator intervention at the Operation level by fixing local faults |
Process Capability Ratio Cp, is a measure of the ability to manufacture product that meets the specification.
Specification Limit Percentage Inside specification ppm Defective
+/- 1 sigma 68.27 317300
+/- 2 sigma 95.45 45500
+/- 3 sigma 99.73 2700
+/- 4 sigma 99.9937 63
+/- 5 sigma 99.999943 0.57
+/- 6 sigma 99.9999998 0.002For a +/- 3 sigma control limits, there will be a 0.27% chance the process points will fall out of
the limits when the process is in control. In another words, for every 370 (1/0.27%) points,
there will be an out of control point.