Bahrain Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1997
(extracts from the report in their original version)
The full report released by:
U.S. Department of State,
the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor,
January 30, 1998.
Bahrain: (Summery)
- Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including
Freedom From:
- a. Political and Other Extrajudicial Killing
- b. Disappearance
- c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment
- d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile
- e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
- f. Arbitrary Interference With Privacy, Family, Home, or
Correspondence
-
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
- a. Freedom of Speech and Press
- b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
- c. Freedom of Religion
- d. Freedom of Movement Within the Country, Foreign Travel,
Emigration, and Repatriation
-
Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of Citizens to
Change Their Government
- Section 4 Governmental Attitude Regarding International and
Nongovernmental Investigation of Alleged Violations of Human
Rights
- Section 5 Discrimination Based on Race, Sex, Religion,
Disability, Language, or Social Status:
-
Religious Minorities
National/Racial/Ethnic Minorities
BAHRAIN
Bahrain is a hereditary emirate with few democratic institutions
and no political parties. The Al-Khalifa extended family has
ruled Bahrain since the late 18th century and dominates its
society and government. The Constitution confirms the Amir as
hereditary ruler. The current Amir, Shaikh Isa Bin Sulman Al
Khalifa, governs Bahrain with the assistance of a younger
brother as Prime Minister, the Amir's son as Crown Prince, and
an appointed cabinet of ministers. In 1975 the Government
suspended some provisions of the 1973 Constitution, including
those articles relating to the National Assembly, which was
disbanded and never reconstituted. Citizens belong to the Shi'a
and Sunni sects of Islam, with the Shi'a comprising over two
thirds of the indigenous population. The Sunnis predominate
because the ruling family is Sunni and is supported by the armed
forces, the security service, and powerful Sunni and Shi'a
merchant families. Bahrain experienced continued political
unrest during the year, including bomb and arson attacks on
public and private property. There are few judicial checks on
the actions of the Amir and his government, and the courts are
subject to government pressure.
The Ministry of Interior is responsible for public security. It
controls the public security force (police) and the extensive
security service, which are responsible for maintaining internal
order. The Bahrain Defense Force (BDF) is responsible for
defending against external threats. It did not play a role in
internal security during the year. Security forces committed
serious human rights abuses.
...
(..) The main problems continue to include the denial of the
right of citizens to change their government; political and
other extrajudicial killings; torture;arbitrary arrest;
incommunicado and prolonged detention;involuntary exile;
limitations on or the denial of the right to a fair public
trial, especially in the security court; infringements on
citizens' right to privacy; and restrictions on freedom of
speech, press, assembly, association, and worker rights. The
Government imposes some limits on freedom of religion and
movement. Domestic violence against women and discrimination
based on sex, religion, and ethnicity remain problems.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
-
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including
Freedom From:
- a. Political and Other Extrajudicial Killing
On June 8, 25-year-old Abdul Zahra Ibrahim Abdullah, from the
village of Sanabis, reportedly died from mistreatment he
received during 2 days of detention. Although authorities cited
ill health as the cause of death, there was no public inquiry
into the allegations that he died from torture.
There were no investigations or prosecutions of any security
forces personnel for alleged extrajudicial killings committed in
earlier years.
Two Asian laborers died on July 5 when antigovernment protesters
set fire to a store in the village of Sitra. On June 13, four
Asian laborers died when a fire destroyed the business
establishment directly below their residence. Credible sources
consider it likely that antigovernment arsonists were
responsible for the attack.
- b. Disappearance
There were no reports of politically motivated disappearances.
- c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment:
Torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or
punishment are prohibited by law; however, there are credible
reports that prisoners often are beaten, both on the soles of
their feet and about the face and head, burned with cigarettes,
forced to endure long periods without sleep, and in some cases
subjected to electrical shocks. The Government has difficulty in
rebutting allegations of torture and of other cruel, inhuman, or
degrading practices because it permits incommunicado detention
and detention without trial. There were no known instances of
authorities being punished for human rights abuses committed
either during the year or in any previous year.
Opposition and human rights groups allege that the security
forces sometimes threaten female detainees with rape and inflict
other forms of sexual abuse and harassment on them while they
are in custody. These allegations are difficult either to
confirm or deny.
...
- d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile:
Arbitrary arrest and detention are problems. The Constitution
states that "no person shall be arrested, detained, imprisoned,
searched or compelled to reside in a specified place...except in
accordance with the provisions of the law and under the
supervision of the judicial authorities." In practice, however,
in matters regarding arrest, detention, or exile, the 1974 State
Security Act takes precedence. Under the State Security Act,
persons may be detained for up to 3 years without trial for
engaging in activities or making statements regarded as a threat
to the broadly defined concepts of national harmony and security
and the Government continued arbitrarily to arrest and detain
citizens. The scope of the State Security Act extends to any
case involving arson, explosions, or attacks on persons at their
place of employment or because of the nature of their work.
Detainees have the right to appeal such detentions after a
period of 3 months and, if the appeal is denied, every 6 months
thereafter from the date of the original detention.
Government security forces used the State Security Act regularly
during the year to detain persons believed by the Government to
be engaging in antigovernment activities, as well as those
attempting to exercise their rights of free speech, association,
or other rights deemed to be in opposition to the Government.
Activities that also can lead to detention, questioning,
warning, or arrest by the security forces include: membership in
illegal organizations or those deemed subversive; painting
antigovernment slogans on walls; joining antigovernment
demonstrations (see Section 2.b.); possessing or circulating
antigovernment writings; preaching sermons considered by the
Government to have an antigovernment political tone; and
harboring or associating with persons committing such acts.
In addition to overseeing the security service and police, the
Ministry of Interior also controls the Office of the Public
Prosecutor, whose officers initially determine whether
sufficient evidence exists to continue to hold a prisoner in
investigative detention. The Ministry is responsible for all
aspects of prison administration. In the early stages of
detention, prisoners and their attorneys have no recourse to any
authority outside the Ministry of Interior. The authorities
rarely permit visits to inmates who are incarcerated for
security-related offenses and such prisoners may be held
incommunicado for months, sometimes years. Prisoners detained
for criminal offenses, however, generally may receive visits
from family members, usually once a month.
Security forces are estimated to have held over 1,300 people in
detention for security-related offenses during the year,
including some who were arrested, released, and then arrested
again. At year's end, as many as 1,100 persons still remained in
detention. The Government pardoned as many as 200 persons
detained in connection with antigovernment activities.
Abdul Amir Al-Jamri, a prominent Shi'a cleric, longtime
opposition activist, and one of the original 14 signers of the
1994 petition to the Amir calling for the restoration of the
National Assembly, was arrested in January 1996 and remained in
custody throughout 1997. Although he is reportedly accused by
the Government of committing a wide variety of security-related
crimes, including treason, Al-Jamri has not been brought to
trial or publicly charged with any crime. Several other Shi'a
clerics associated with Al-Jamri, Abdul Wahab Hussein, Hassan
Mushaimaa, Hassan Sultan, Ali Bin Ahmed Al-Jedhafsi, Haji Hassan
Jarallah, and Ali Mirza Al-Nachas also were arrested at the same
time as Al-Jamri and remain in jail. On June 29, the Government
announced that Al-Nachas died in detention of natural causes.
....
- e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The Constitution provides for an independent judiciary; however,
the courts are subject to government pressure regarding
sentencing and appeals.
The civil and criminal legal system consists of a complex mix of
courts, based on diverse legal sources including Sunni and Shi'a
Shari'a (Islamic law), tribal law, and other civil codes and
regulations. The 1974 State Security Act created a separate,
closed security court system which has jurisdiction in cases of
alleged antigovernment activity.
....
Defense attorneys are appointed by the Ministry of Justice and
Islamic Affairs. Some attorneys and family members involved in
politically sensitive criminal cases complain that the
Government interferes with court proceedings to influence the
outcome or to prevent judgments from being carried out. There
are periodic allegations of corruption in the judicial system.
.....
Security cases are tried in secret by the Supreme Court of
Appeals, sitting as the Security Court. Family members are
usually not permitted in the court until the final verdict is
rendered. Procedures in the security courts do not provide for
even the most basic safeguards. The Security Court is exempt
from adhering to the procedural protections of the Penal Code.
Defendants may be represented by counsel but seldom see their
attorneys before the actual day of arraignment. Convictions may
be based solely on confessions and police evidence or testimony
that may be introduced in secret. The defense cannot review the
evidence against the defendant prior to trial proceedings.
Defense lawyers complain that they rarely are given sufficient
time to develop witnesses. There is no right to judicial review
of the legality of arrests. There is no judicial appeal of a
State Security Court verdict, but the defendant may request
clemency from the Amir. In March the Security Court tried 59
individuals on charges of being members of a terrorist
organization aimed at overthrowing the Government. The Security
Court ultimately convicted 33 individuals and acquitted 24.
The number of political prisoners is difficult to determine
because the Government does not release data on security cases,
such cases are not tried in open court, and visits to prisoners
convicted of security offenses are strictly restricted. The
Government denies that there are any political prisoners, and
claims that all inmates incarcerated for committing security
offenses were convicted properly of subversive acts such as
espionage, espousing or committing violence, or belonging to
terrorist organizations.
.......
- f. Arbitrary Interference With Privacy, Family, Home, or
Correspondence
Under the law, the Ministry of Interior is empowered to
authorize entry into private premises without specific judicial
intervention. Domestic and international telephone calls and
correspondence are subject to monitoring. Police informer
networks are extensive and sophisticated.
During the year, the Government frequently infringed on
citizens' right to privacy, using illegal searches and arbitrary
arrests as tactics to control political unrest. Security forces
frequently raided villages at night, entered private homes
without warrants, and took into custody residents who were
suspected of either participating in or having information
regarding antigovernment activities. While conducting these
raids, security forces frequently confiscated, damaged, or
destroyed personal property, for which owners were not
compensated by the Government. Security forces also frequently
set up checkpoints at the entrances to villages, requiring
vehicle searches and proof of identity from anyone seeking to
enter or exit. Whenever possible, the Government jams either in
whole or in part foreign broadcasts that carry antigovernment
programming or commentary. A government-controlled proxy
prohibits user access to Internet sites considered to be
antigovernment or anti-Islamic (see Section 2.a.).
- Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
- a. Freedom of Speech and Press:
Although the Constitution provides for the right "to express and
propagate opinions," citizens are not, in practice, free to
express their public opposition to the Government in speech or
writing. Press criticism of ruling family personalities and of
government policy regarding certain sensitive subjects--such as
sectarian unrest and the dispute with Qatar over the Hawar
Islands--are strictly prohibited. However, local press coverage
and commentary on international issues is open, and discussion
of local economic and commercial issues is also relatively
unrestricted. Many individuals express critical opinions openly
on domestic political and social issues in private settings but
do not do so to leading government officials or in public
forums.
The Information Ministry exercises sweeping control over all
local media. Newspapers are privately owned, but they routinely
exercise self-censorship of stories on sensitive topics. The
Government does not condone unfavorable coverage of its domestic
policies by the international media and has occasionally revoked
the press credentials of offending journalists. Since the
Ministry also sponsors foreign journalists' residence permits,
this action can lead to deportation. In July the Government
revoked the press credentials of a resident Deutche
Presse-Agentur correspondent and ordered her out of the country
on grounds that she had endangered the country's national
security by filing an unsubstantiated report on local political
developments. The Government generally afforded foreign
journalists access to the country and did not limit their
contacts on the island.
The State owns and operates all radio and television stations.
Radio and television broadcasts in Arabic and Farsi from
neighboring countries and Egypt can be received without
interference. However, international news services, including
the Associated Press, United Press International, and Agence
France Presse, frequently complain about press restrictions. The
Cable News Network is available on a 24-hour basis by
subscription and the British Broadcasting Corporation world news
service is carried on a local channel 24 hours a day free of
charge. However, the Government generally jams wholly or
partially foreign broadcasts that carry antigovernment
programming or commentary (see Section 1.f.).
Many senior government officials, ruling family members, and
major hotels use satellite dishes to receive international
broadcasts, as do well-to-do private citizens. The Ministry of
Information closely controls access to satellite dishes, and the
importation or installation of dishes without prior government
approval is illegal.
Access to the Internet is provided through the National
Telephone Company (BATELCO). A government-controlled proxy
prohibits user access to sites considered to be antigovernment
or anti-Islamic; E-mail access to information is unimpeded,
although it may be subject to monitoring (see Section 1.f.).
Although there are no formal regulations limiting academic
freedom, in practice academics try to avoid contentious
political issues. University hiring and admissions policies
appear to favor Sunnis and others who are assumed to be
supportive of the Government, rather than focus on professional
experience and academic qualifications.
- b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
Despite the Constitution's provision for the right of free
assembly, the Government prohibits all public political
demonstrations and meetings and controls religious gatherings
that may take on political overtones. Permits are required for
most other public gatherings and permission is not routinely
granted. Unauthorized public gatherings of more than five
persons are prohibited by law. The Government monitors
gatherings that might take on a political tone and frequently
disperses such meetings.
On numerous occasions during the year, the security forces used
force, including tear gas, to disperse gatherings during which
protesters called for the reestablishment of an elected
parliament and the release of prisoners, objected to Al-Khalifa
rule, denounced police brutality, protested foreigners in the
security forces and in the labor force, or demanded increased
employment opportunities. After each of these incidents,
suspected leaders and active participants were arrested.
The Constitution provides for the right of free association;
however, the Government restricts freedom of association. The
Government prohibits political parties and organizations. Some
professional societies and social/sports clubs have
traditionally served as forums for discreet political
discussion, but they are restricted by law from engaging in
political activity. Only the Bahraini Bar Association is exempt
from the regulations that require that the constitution of all
associations include a commitment to refrain from political
activity. The Bar Association successfully argued that a
lawyer's professional duties may require certain political
actions, such as interpreting legislation or participating in a
politically sensitive trial. Other organized discussions and
meetings are still actively discouraged.
- c. Freedom of Religion:
Both Sunni and Shi'a are subject to governmental control and
monitoring. During the year, the Government frequently closed
mosques and ma'tams (Shi'a community centers) in certain
locations to prevent religious leaders from delivering political
speeches during their Friday prayers and sermons. The High
Council for Islamic Affairs is charged with review and approval
of all clerical appointments within both the Sunni and Shi'a
communities and maintains program oversight for all citizens
studying religion abroad. Public religious events, most notably
the large annual commemorative marches by Shi'a, are permitted
but are closely watched by the police. (..)
- d. Freedom of Movement Within the Country, Foreign Travel,
Emigration, and Repatriation:
Citizens are free to move within the country and change their
place of residence or work. Passports, however, may be denied on
political grounds. Approximately 3 percent of the indigenous
population, the "bidoon," or stateless persons, mostly
Persian-origin Shi'a, do not have passports and cannot readily
obtain them, although they may be given travel documents as
Bahraini residents (see section 5). The Government occasionally
grants citizenship to resident non-Bahrainis who are Sunni
Muslims, mostly from the Arabian peninsula and Egypt.
.....
- Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of Citizens to
Change Their Government:
Citizens do not have the right or ability peacefully to change
their government or their political system, and political
activity is strictly controlled by the Government. Since the
dissolution of the National Assembly in 1975, there have been no
formal democratic political institutions. The Prime Minister
makes all appointments to the Cabinet. All other government
positions are filled by the relevant ministries. About one-third
of the cabinet ministers are Shi'a Muslim, although they do not
hold security-related offices. (..)
.....
- Section4 Governmental Attitude Regarding International and Non-
governmental Investigation of Alleged Violations of Human
Rights:
There are no local human rights organizations. Because of the
restrictions on freedom of association and expression, any
independent, domestically-based investigation or public
criticism of the Government's human rights policies faces major
obstacles. A number of groups based abroad report on alleged
human rights violations. (..)
The Government maintains that it is not opposed to visits by
bona fide human rights organizations. In practice, however,
international human rights organizations have found it difficult
to conduct activities in Bahrain. (..)
- Section 5 Discrimination Based on Race, Sex, Religion,
Disability, Language, or Social Status:
The Constitution states that "liberty, equality, security,
tranquillity, education, social solidarity, and equal
opportunities for citizens shall be pillars of society assured
by the State." It further states that every citizen shall have
the right to medical care, welfare, education, property,
capital, and work. In practice, however, these rights are
unevenly protected, depending on the individual's social status,
ethnicity, or sex.
......
Detentions and arrests of juveniles, some as young as 7 years
old, were numerous during the year in connection with the
political unrest. These children were generally released without
charges within several days of their arrests. However, those
juveniles charged with security offenses received the same
treatment as adult prisoners, i.e., incommunicado detention and
trial before a State Security Court.
......
Religious Minorities:
Although there are notable exceptions, the Sunni Muslim minority
enjoys a favored status in Bahrain. Sunnis generally receive
preference for employment in sensitive government positions and
in the managerial ranks of the civil service. Shi'a citizens are
not allowed to hold significant posts in the Bahrain defense and
internal security forces. In the private sector, Shi'a tend to
be employed in lower paid, less skilled jobs.
....
National/Racial/Ethnic Minorities:
A group of approximately 9,000 to 15,000 persons, mostly Shi'a
of Persian-origin, but including some Christians, are stateless.
They are commonly known as bidoon and enjoy less than full
citizenship under the Citizenship Act of 1963. Many of the
bidoon are second- or third-generation residents whose ancestors
emigrated from Iran. Although they no longer claim Iranian
citizenship, they have not been granted Bahraini nationality.
Without citizenship these individuals officially are unable to
buy land, start a business, or obtain government loans, although
in practice many do. The law does not address the citizenship
rights of persons who were not registered with the authorities
prior to 1959, creating a legal problem for such persons and
their descendants and resulting in economic and other hardships.
The Government maintains that many of those who claim to be
bidoon are actually citizens of Iran or other Gulf states who
have voluntarily chosen not to renew their foreign passports.
Bidoon and Bahrainis who speak Farsi, rather than Arabic, as
their first language also face significant social and economic
obstacles, including difficulty finding employment.
......
[end of document]