Choosing the Game
Need vs. Love
As our
lives pass from cradle to grave we play many different games.
As toddlers we play children’s games. As teenagers our
mental games advance. By the time we reach adulthood, we
become masters at the games of Life.
Let’s
look at this analogy in the physical first. Sometimes we
choose mental games such as chess or bridge. Sometimes we
decide on contact sports. And at other times, we choose games
that compete with fate, such as solitaire. All these choices
come from our inner desires. Let’s investigate how this
relates to our mates.
The
"Game of Life" as related to our romantic partners
sometimes takes on the characteristics of a combative
sporting event. We may hate to admit this, but after a closer
look, we can see that it is true.
Although this
book focuses on the romantic aspects of a heterosexual
relationship, these concepts apply to all relationships,
whether they be straight or gay, friendships, business,
familial, careers, etc. You may even have a relationship with
an inanimate object or a pet.
The games we
choose in life symbolize something. Our goal is to find out
what that something is.
The next
question we must answer is: What purpose does this
relationship game fill?
All romantic
relationships fill a deep-seated need somewhere in our
psyche. These needs are usually buried so deep in our minds,
in our subconscious, we aren’t even aware of them. This
is the exact reason why it is difficult for us to conceive of
our relationship as an unhealthy game. This would mean
admitting that there is something unhealthy within our own
minds.
Most
relationships are built on the precept: "I am incomplete
and have no way of feeling good about myself." This
belief necessitates that our special partners fill our abyss
of need. This, in turn, puts us in a position where our
happiness is dependent upon our special person completing or
fulfilling the lack within ourselves. What a burden to put on
someone you love!
From this
psychologically dependent perspective, we can see that we use
our partner for the capacity they have to keep our needs
repressed.
Some
therapists point out that all our needs stem from the
incomplete love acted out between parent and child. In other
words, we search for the love our parents never gave us. In
turn, through our subconscious, we relate to or seek out most
often, people like our parents in order to rework the
problems we faced as children.
Some
spiritual paths point to the fact that our search for love in
our dualistic perceptual world stems from the belief that God
was incapable of giving us the love we need. So, in turn, we
relate to other people in hopes of filling the void in our
lives by means of relationships. Every relationship we seek
here on planet Earth can be used as a substitute for our true
relationship with our Spiritual Parent.
God is love.
Not only is God love, but His love is complete and
unconditional. This is a fact. Just because we cannot
perceive and/or accept God’s love doesn’t mean it
hasn’t been offered nor does it in any way alter that
Truth.
Now we begin
to see the unhealthy games of needy love we have chosen. We
usually select a mate based on their ability to supplement
our perceived lacks. We feel, albeit subconsciously, that by
some miraculous or manipulative method we can exchange
attributes with our mate and thereby supply each other with
what we individually lack within ourselves.
A Course in
Miracles® says it this way, "This
‘self’ seeks the relationship to make itself
complete. Yet when it finds the special relationship in which
it thinks it can accomplish this it gives itself away and
tries to ‘trade’ itself for the self of another.
This is not union…" (p. 342, text)
Is this not
foolishness? There is no greater misfortune than to mistake
codependency for love.
Love gives
and asks for nothing in return.
In the Game
of Life we choose when and where we play, which teammates
become our fellow players and who becomes our opposition. Our
love relationships may be "dressed up pretty." All
our uniforms may match and we may be well rehearsed, but as
ego-driven beings we usually choose from a psychological
place of lack. The object of that game is to win and be named
"most valuable player". But as we confront our
partners in a love match we soon realize we don’t
understand the goal of the game. We don’t know how to
win. That’s because we have our games confused.
As we awaken
to our spiritual destiny, we begin to recognize that all
players are "valuable" and that one person’s
win is often another’s loss. The rules of the Game of
Life are no longer appropriate. They are no longer
functional. No longer acceptable. At that point, the Game of
Life may be transformed into the Game of Love and the goal
changes. Now we begin to explore and discover ways for
everyone to win.
THE CLOCK IS
TICKING.
LET THE GAMES
BEGIN.
"A Course in Miracles"(c) is copyrighted by the Foundation for "A Course in Miracles"(r), Roscoe, NY.
The opinions and interpretations presented herein are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the copyright owner.