Photos and Films There are films and pictures of bigfoot taken everywhere across the world. Many a clever hoax, others are other animals mistaken for bigfoot. So we have the hoaxes and we have the Patterson/Gimlin Film shot on a 16mm Kodak video camera, by a rodeo clown. In the film it shows a large creature resembling visually a gorilla rather than a human. How would you explain this? Most skeptics would say it is a simple hoax. It is just a man dressed in a gorilla suit. As he wore that suit he danced around and did the marvously realistic Sasquatch Shuffle. That is all possible but did Patterson and Gimlin go through the troubles of giving the famous bigfoot breasts as it is seen in the Patterson tape. If they did this then how did they find footprints to make casts similar to those found that exact area. Then, finally if they had done all of this where did they find someone large enough to play a 7+ ft bipedal, upright standing animal.
How would you explain this? Most skeptics would say it is a simple hoax. It is just a man dressed in a gorilla suit. As he wore that suit he danced around and did the marvously realistic Sasquatch Shuffle. That is all possible but did Patterson and Gimlin go through the troubles of giving the famous bigfoot breasts as it is seen in the Patterson tape. If they did this then how did they find footprints to make casts similar to those found that exact area. Then, finally if they had done all of this where did they find someone large enough to play a 7+ ft bipedal, upright standing animal.
It couldn't have been a Hallucination and they couldn't of lied about it because we all know you can't film a hallucination or a lie. Maybe it was another creature that was mistaken for a bigfoot. It certainly wasn't a bear a bear couldn't walk like that and they certainly don't look like that. Maybe it was a gorilla, now that could be true if we live in China or India where there are gorillas that roam wild, but here in the Pacific Northwest I can speak knowingly that there are not large primates walking around in the woods behind my house. Or anyone's house in this area, I am absolutly sure of that. So what does everyone see. Read on to find out. Sightings People spot the elusive bigfoot all over that country at all times of the day and night. Though it is believed that Bukwas is primarily nocturnal creatures. Thousands of reports are submitted every year, read and checked for credibility. Out of those thousands only about 1/8 to 1/4 are really looked into. How would youe explain all these sightings. Some could be a mistaken bear or large creature. Others could be hallucinations or maybe they are just plain lying. Some maybe cause by drugs and drinking but I can't speek for me and my family. When we saw that bigfoot none of us had been drinking (most were too young anyways, those that were still are) and I was not tired or unhealthy in any way. I know I was not halluciating beacause four other people saw it too. Unlike some people I don't believe in mass hallucination. So you explain it for me. I believe it was Bigfoot.
Tracks Hundreds of track casts are brought in every year around the world. These tracks are in the sizes much larger than any normal human. There are some exceptions. For example: Shaquille O'Neal or a Spokane, Washington teenager couldn't find shoes to wear because no one carried size 28. Even if there were these exceptionally large footed people walking around in the woods they wouldn't resemble bigfoot tracks because their feet are too thin. Maybe there is some elite organization unkwon to all of us. Hundreds of people spread across the nation and the world whose only thoought is to cause question and doubt amoung us. Walking through the mud and the dirt with their hand made footprint casts that are in their own personal shape. Everyones is different. My thoughts exactly, NO WAY!
Ok the people that find them make it. WHY?? To get fame and fortune. Not hardly. You will probably get a little recognition from the few people that research bigfoot and when they do find out you faked them and they will they'll know you as a lier and a hoax and never speak to you again. What is the point??
Hair Samples This is the confusing part. My father being a cop and me his son I know that in murder cases if there is hair or skin under the victims fingernails thay are overjoyed. If they can track DNA from some hair and skin samples to a killer why can't they track DNA of a hair sample to a bigfoot. That is just my question. Well my question has been answered. There are currently hair samples being tested. All of the samples that have came back were listed as "UNKNOWN PRIMATE". All I have to say is that facts speak for themselves. If you just think logically and follow the facts the only answer left is that there is a large 500+ lbs animal that is or 6 ft average creature that walks on two feet standing upright or slightly stooped over. This animal is uncatalogued as a known and respected creature of the animal kingdom.
Get your own Free Home Page